Secondly, CrossSearch - Dundee Universities online journal search, with online reading facility - has decided to crash due to high volumes trying to access it. I guess it's acceptable, given it's the week before the end of semester. Alas, I do not fear as my previous in depth research into my topic has left me with various other alternatives.
Below is the beginning of my original write up, however as stated above it is no longer what I will be continuing with, but I thought I would post it anyway, as a more in depth annotation if you will.
Dellarocas, C. & Narayan, R. (2006). A Statistical Measure of a Population's Propensity to Engage in Post-Purchase Online Word-of-Mouth. Institute of Mathematical Statistics: Statistical Science. Vol 21. (No. 2.). p. 280.
Dellarocas and Narayan provide statistical evidence to support the word of mouth theory by which information regarding an object, service or the like is passed along with added opinions of their success. From this, a reputation occurs, usually either in the form of a recommendation or the opposite - advice to avoid such a item. This can be generated solely from personal opinion; if enough people recommend a product, the general consensus would be that the product is good, and someone with no prior knowledge of it would then consider buying or using such an item as a result.
Viral marketing aims to generate commotion and uproar around a selected object - with the ultimate outcome being that an explosive word of mouth epidemic radiates out from their epicentre of advertising. It relies upon not only an outlandish memorable advert and or performance to kick start such a process, but it long term relies upon the public reacting to the original incident and then passing their experience along, with an accelerating effect. This is where word of mouth statistics are highly crucial, as these must be taken into account when tailoring the perfect viral marketing campaign. It must also appear effortless; as if it was a mishap or accidental broadcast. An example of such forced accidental viral campaign is that of Threshers Christmas discount voucher. They "accidentally" released a "suppliers only" voucher which entitled the user to 40% off. The online leak caused unprecedented circulation for such a small campaign, thus being highly successful.
My "new and improved" summary of:
Hill, S., Provost, F. & Volinsky, C. (2006). Network-Based Marketing: Identifying Likely Adopters Via Consumer Networks. Institute of Mathematical Statistics: Statistical Science. Vol. 21. (No. 2.). p. 256-260.
Godin, S. (2005). Purple Cow. London, UK: Penguin Books. p.7, 31-32, 79-80.
Dorrian, M. & Lucas, G. (2006). Guerrilla Advertising: Unconventional Brand Communication. London, UK: Laurence King Publishing. p.54-101.
Kirkby, J. & Marsden, P. (2006). Connected Marketing: The Viral, Buzz and Word Of Mouth Revolution. Oxford, Great Britain and MA, USA: Butterworth-Heinmann of Elsevier.
will follow shortly.
0 comments:
Post a Comment